Thank you for your email regarding family law reform. A motion passed by the Senate earlier this year called for the Government to undertake a “root and branch” review of Australia’s Family Courts and to implement a non-adversarial trial system in those courts. While Labor considers that a well-functioning family law system is crucial for access to justice for all Australians, Labor does not consider that a “root and branch” review of the Family Courts is necessary or desirable. A less adversarial trial (LAT) approach was introduced into the Family Court in 2006 by the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act. The enactment of that legislation followed the 2003 House of Representatives inquiry and a trial conducted in the Family Court at about the same time, known as the Children’s Cases Program. The LAT approach is mandated in Division 12A of Part VII in the Family Law Act. It applies to all child-related proceedings and in financial matters by consent. The LAT has been a highly significant departure from the traditional adversarial trial in Family Court proceedings. The family law system in Australia has been developed over many decades, and generally operates effectively in what is an extremely difficult area of the law. All legal frameworks should be subject to ongoing review and reform where the need for improvements are identified. However, there is no basis for a “root-and-branch” review of the entire family law system in Australia. Labor has a strong record in family law reform and will continue to work with all participants in the family law system to develop policy for effective, sensible reform. Regards, Warren Information Services Unit Australian Labor Campaign Headquarters On 2016-06-09T17:04:07+10:00, "sirslackcat" <sirslackcat@msn.com> wrote: > > https://dohsareliarershaveyoursay.blogspot.com.au/ > > If you want my vote check this out and change the system the system was introduced back in the whitlen goverment days as was the programs that was imported into australia they had put the circut in place as the same as the courts run today a farther does not stand a chance if he speaks out about the system being corupt this system faither the mother the mother can do no wrong please if you want help this country do somthing about the corrupt system threw australia courts the department of human services child protection are all corrupt
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Thank you for your email regarding family law reform. A motion passed by the Senate earlier this year called for the Government to undertake a “root and branch” review of Australia’s Family Courts and to implement a non-adversarial trial system in those courts. While Labor considers that a well-functioning family law system is crucial for access to justice for all Australians, Labor does not consider that a “root and branch” review of the Family Courts is necessary or desirable. A less adversarial trial (LAT) approach was introduced into the Family Court in 2006 by the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act. The enactment of that legislation followed the 2003 House of Representatives inquiry and a trial conducted in the Family Court at about the same time, known as the Children’s Cases Program. The LAT approach is mandated in Division 12A of Part VII in the Family Law Act. It applies to all child-related proceedings and in financial matters by consent. The LAT has been a highly significant departure from the traditional adversarial trial in Family Court proceedings. The family law system in Australia has been developed over many decades, and generally operates effectively in what is an extremely difficult area of the law. All legal frameworks should be subject to ongoing review and reform where the need for improvements are identified. However, there is no basis for a “root-and-branch” review of the entire family law system in Australia. Labor has a strong record in family law reform and will continue to work with all participants in the family law system to develop policy for effective, sensible reform. Regards, Warren Information Services Unit Australian Labor Campaign Headquarters On 2016-06-09T17:04:07+10:00, "sirslackcat" wrote: > > https://dohsareliarershaveyoursay.blogspot.com.au/ > > If you want my vote check this out and change the system the system was introduced back in the whitlen goverment days as was the programs that was imported into australia they had put the circut in place as the same as the courts run today a farther does not stand a chance if he speaks out about the system being corupt this system faither the mother the mother can do no wrong please if you want help this country do somthing about the corrupt system threw australia courts the department of human services child protection are all corrupt
Friday, June 10, 2016
No society that justifies human trafficking in the name of child protection can call itself civilized. What is human trafficking? According to the definition there are two primary qualifications for human trafficking: 1, The restriction of movement, and 2. The commercial exploitation of the person. Obviously foster care meets the first qualification, add financial incentives for removal and the child welfare system meets both qualifications. State funding only partially covers the costs of basic care for foster kids. So where does the rest of that money go? I do not know, but I can tell you where it doesn't go, to help those children. THAT is commercial exploitation and THAT makes it human trafficking, literally by definition.. -A-sh F@wke5
https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/…/19981-studies…
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/…/researc…/statistics-research/afcars
http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=6703
http://www.naasca.org/ForOurKids/
https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/s_disrup.pdf
http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=4656
http://www2.gov.bc.ca/…/special_report_children_and_youth_i…
http://promises2kids.org/facts-figures/
http://metronews.ca/…/cfs-kids-in-manitoba-do-much-more-po…/
www2.gov.bc.ca/…/data-monit…/reporting-monitoring/statistics
http://www.ptsd.va.gov/…/ptsd_in_children_and_adolescents_o…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…/reactive-attachment-disorde…
https://www.unodc.org/…/huma…/what-is-human-trafficking.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Monday, June 6, 2016
The legal system is corrupt it is all run on the department of human services reports so the parents fighting for there child does not stand a chance for getting legal aid bennefits legal aid follow the reports that the department write in most cases the department write these reports to cover there own tracks with the lyes and degrading infomation this has been an on going event for years they would rather give a child to a parent who has a background in neglection and abuse and not being able to protect a child the system must be stopped as this department has to much to say in the eyes of a child and the system should be scraped and a new system should be made to australia standards not usa standards the circut must be stopped as once a parent is in the circut they can lose there little ones for years this new system should be put in place before more children are hurt or even killed the system is outdated and imported from the usa by the whitlam goverment from the seventys
Saturday, June 4, 2016
HI IM CALLING OR MY BROTHERS AND SISTER OUT TO MARCH THE STREETS OF EVERY COURT HOUSE IN AUSTRALIA TO BE HEARD AS TO STOP THE CORRUPTION IN CHILD PROTECTION DONT BE AFRAID AS WE WILL FORM AS ONE TO STAMP OUT CHILD ABUSE AND STEELING OF OUR LOVED CHILDREN AS THIS GOVERMENT DEPARTMENT HAS TO BE STOPPED THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES PLEASE NOTE ON EARLIER POST
Friday, June 3, 2016
WE WILL FIGHT HARD AS WE ARE WITH LUKES ARMY AS I SHED A TEAR FOR LUKE WHO DIED IN THE HANDS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DOC CHILD PROTECTION THEY LIED AND TOLD CRAP THE TRUTH WAS THAT THEY NEVER DID A LEGAL CHECK ON THE CARER AS HOW MANY MORE CHILDREN HAVE TO DIE IN THE HANDS OF THIS CORRUPT SYSTEM THE GOVERMENT IMPORTED FROM TH USA THIS SYSTEM HAS NOT CHANGED FROM THE SEVENTYS WE WILL NOT REST UNTIL THIS SYSTEM IS CLOSED DOWN AND A NEW SYSTEM IS PUT IN PLACE
Thursday, June 2, 2016
one more week to wait for judges decision on reunification.......the welfare treated me like scum at court and made me cry.....I must stay strong.....three years I have been fighting to get her back on false allegations of not treating her constipation....three years I can never get back....now they are trying to use the law which was changed to suit welfare's needs......its a law saying....that a child who has been in their care for over twelve months and in custody to the secretary...may be put into permanent care.....but I implored the judge to take into account the fact that all legal representatives ,other than welfare's bias lawyers,now concede that I am not guilty and to take into account these last three years of fighting and to also take into count,the fact that I had made her a safe and stable home and not a drug-go or sexual weirdo or an alcoholic.....when she was in my care and am the same today....all I can do is wait.
once again rose dont let this department walk over you as they walk over so many others and break familys up with there lyes and wrong infomation about good parents be safe and enjoy your time with a great daughter from sirslackcat
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)