Dohs should be ashamed of there system as they dont protect they have a system that was bought out by the whitlem goverment and does not come under the Australian standards so if you are a female you okay as you can play there system there favours just the female in court you as a female can abuse the judge make threats you can threaten to burn a place down were your little one is staying in and the mother can even threaten the the father of the child that she is going to kill him in a court foyer the mother can neglect a child and admit it in court and walk away scot free this system realy sucks as the father is pushed out of a childs life because of the lyes and bushit that dohs make up about the fathers but the mothers says l am the mother the father going threw court system fighting for there child just dont have the same rites as a mother this is hapening all threw the court system threw out our great land were all fathers are tard with the same brush no matter what race you are the court system is run by dohs and they make all the rulings how many children have been killed in there foster care program how many children get killed from there neglection of the truth as a female can never do wrong in the eyes of dohs not to mention that they employ corrupt worker rude workers and lying workers who print utter gabage abourt good fathers as have of these worker they employ dont have a child them self but do not understand what the real life is when you have a child they form there opiniun of a person out of text book these text books and the programs as l wrote early in this paragraph are writen for the usa standards not the ausy standards we live in the 2000 now not 1974 there standards are in the seventys these programs are crap they are not for the courts in this country the dohs are corrupt they are old fashion in all ways they need to wake up as there system is failing the child and the good parents who care about there child the system is rubbish the system is a killer for children and parents a like the system has taken so many males and children in the last 20 years we are hearing more about the blunders of dohs more and more they get payed for holding your child in there foster care program they are even trying to deploy these new laws if you dont get your act together in twelve months they take your child and leave them with foster care parents these carers dont have background checks they dont even have drug test this is a bloody horrifying story but is true that dohs are doing this is even the child protection workers dont have these random drug test as they work around children they cover all this up if a good parent picks up on this and corrupt worker he or she is a subject to false psychological tests and iq test to degrade a person who has spoken up they take the child from a lovely home and place the child in with the dogs were the child is neglected and beaten and find the child now has problems with headachs and not feeling the best dohs you have a lot to answer to in reguards to a child well being in the system you have your system is crap and needs to be revamped the solicitors you employ are liars and need to be revamped as they are as dangerouse as your protective workers who are not worth a pinch of cows doo in a paddock with flys flying around it dohs get your act together this is not the seventys we live in stop protecting and making exscuses for the mother give the fathers the rite with there children as father can look after a child far better than most women out there cheers all enjoy my site and dont forget to share your thoughts on my site after all have your say dont be afraid as we need to get this out in the open

 

After all dads can do it just as well as mum if not better 

New child protection laws to remove kids will be retrospect this is so they put your child in care and make money out of the parents

Child protection laws come into effect next month giving parents two years' grace before permanently losing custody of their children.

• 'Systemic deficiencies': Auditor-General slams DHHS child protection failures
• Law reforms on children in care could create 'stolen generation'

VIctoria Legal Aid and the Law Institute have raised serious concerns about tough new child protection laws that will come into effect next month, giving parents two years to get their acts together before permanently losing custody of their children.

The laws will be retrospective, meaning thousands of parents currently subject to a Children's Court order could have just months to prove their ability to look after their children. Others will automatically lose that chance.

The changes will increase the number of children the department can place up for adoption, limit the powers of the Children's Court of Victoria to review decisions made by the department, and make it easier for children to be permanently removed from their parents' custody.

Legal groups are concerned that support services parents have to complete before their child is returned to their care, like men's behavioural change programs, are overburdened and subject to lengthy waiting lists.

The Law Institute says it is unfair to prevent children being returned to their parents due to lack of resources or waiting lists to access services.

Legal Aid's child protection program manager, Lucia Danek, said waiting lists at men's behavioural change programs were several months.

"Those arbitrary timeframes are overlaid on  a system that is exhausted," she said.

Legal Aid's family, youth and children's law executive director, Nicole Rich, said the Department of Health and Human Services was doing its best, but the Children's Court should retain its oversight of department decisions.

"We know that no government department ever gets everything right, and these are really serious decisions, and we need to make sure that every decision is properly scrutinised."

Deb Tsobaris, the chief executive of the Centre for Excellence, a peak body representing nearly 100 child and family services, said the new laws would address the problem of kids floating around "from placement to placement".

But she agreed that more services were needed to support parents trying to have their children returned to them. "We're all worried about that."

Fleur Ward, a lawyer who represents families in the Children's Court and is chairwoman of the Law Institute's children and youth issues committee, said the change "amounts to the permanent, systematic deprivation of children from their parents".

"You can't create these timeframes and not empower the courts to take into account these waiting lists. How can you have a timeframe ticking against people if they're up against waiting lists they have no control over?"

An Auditor-General's report last year found the number of children reported to the Department of Health and Human Services had increased by 92 per cent in the past seven years, to more than 82,000 in the 2013-14 financial year.

Auditor-General John Doyle found that DHHS's early-intervention system was characterised by "systemic deficiencies" and a lack of oversight, and the failure to keep or analyse proper records from the agencies it relies on to deliver early-intervention services to children and families.

"The department does not know whether the services provided are effectively meeting the needs of vulnerable families," Mr Doyle found.

The government says it will review the changes in six months

Help save my son from Dhs come home

Ref to Son that is 8 mth old 
In June 1 st 2015 dhs Dandenong put a protective order in place were to told the court that I was a paeodiphile and 11 years ago saying to the court I touch my son the story was terrible story dhs claim to judge for that reason to took hunter of me and put hunter into a cara 
They have made many allegation about me and they have gone no were this is all about the care and trying to keep hunter with his half brother in saying that Son has five other brother and sister as well I have a other son zaron that dhs stole of me with fules allegation . We're dhs have taken away my Son human resources rights
October 2007 of 1.3 as well regarding to basic human right that were taken away from both of my children as well as my family and my self under the UN human rights office to the high commissioner under convention on the rights of the children that where made by the UN when the Australia government signed the UN agreement in 1999 and then bob hawk made a act under bob hawk in 2000 the government made a act bob hawk act of with Australia then become a part of the UN so there for owe Laws here in Victoria under the bob hawk act the UN laws over right the Victoria laws 
Then hide behind the commonwealth consolidate act family law act 1975 sect 121


They have also taken son  rights under UN children human rightsu

Plus the ignore the child right 

Dhs keep breaking law why the damage they are doing to my son who is 8 mth old 

The care has gone for joint party and custard of hunter were the judge nock back.
Just before Christmas my son had his eye cut open dhs said that hunter fall over near a pool then hit a door 
Witch one was is we ask for medical certificate they made there own up 
What are they hiding 
On the 11 feb 2016 dhs said the care let the mother who is a junky see hunter when ever Shi want that also a breach of order I ask did the mother have so that is 8 mth old  is this why son  had his eye cut open throw the mother dropping him the question to ask 
We're the duty of care from the care and dhs.

Dhs have since then assaulted me every day to day base as well they keep 
Now my son is 8 mth old now we are going back to court 11 February we are going for final orders .

As well we have taken the docerment that dhs has fraud medical certificates now the police in Victoria are now invested gating the crimes of fraud .now as well we are asking the judge to looking into crimes that dhs have done In regarding to the crimes act 2.9.9.2 crimes s34 judges or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested 2 years dhs s35 giving false testimony s36 fabricating evidence s38 deceiving witness s41 conspiracy to bring false accusation s43 attempting to pervert justice s44 compounding offences all of these crimes are under pererting the course of justice - commonwealth statutory scheme 


We are seeking compensation for damages slander definition tress passing assault harassment loss of work .
This will be happening dhs Dandenong there works will be charged and the justices will be done for all family's and owe future children .
but there is still the matter of my son that is now 15 and thinks his dad his dad use to do bad things to him now my son has to face the truth what a muck up that the family court have done as well as dhs . I hope the damage that has been done can be undone 


We have been the children court 6 times and making fules statments to the judge
On the 11 th we went to Supreme Court for a cc they have now ref this case to a trail in four weeks

Every service that dhs have a influence witness . and they make more fules claim to delay hunter coming home 
Dhs Dandenong now have change 
case work 3 times they have withdraw the statement that they put to the courts at the being and have admitted they have made misdated in this case